It doesn’t require the handful of swing states to be onboard. It just requires the heavy hitters which are largely marginalized by the electoral college and some of the smaller deep left or right states which are also made pretty irrelevant in terms of campaigning even if they get a bit more influence
Lol, mocking a disabled reporter, bragging about sexual assault, praising Hitler and trying to overturn an election wasn’t political suicide, stop trying to predict last straws for his career, there is no bottom.
TWO slaps on the wrist.
33% seems high for “people who are apparently barely ever online”
Yeah, Adobe is the worst.
HDR support and Adobe support… All I really still need…
I mean, if the car needs a cellular subscription.
Clearly the better solution, this will drive down the price of chairs and dramatically reduce the chairless population.
There is an entire trans community Lemmy instance in case you were unaware. Not saying it makes transphobia here okay or anything, just might be helpful to know.
Holy shit Intuit and GM better shape the fuck up or the workers should just hurry up and fucking do it.
Yes, clearly he means demolishing Bonneville Dam, somehow reversing the flow of the Willamette and then digging a trench through Grants Pass, where, if we flood the San Joaquin Valley will provide plenty of water to LA.
The Atlantic really flexing their journalism muscle with this one.
I don’t see how that’s relevant to what I was saying
They don’t, white phosphorous is also extremely poisonous. It’s also sticky
But thermite won’t eat your bones and kill your organs…
I assure you you’d rather get bits of thermite on your skin than bits of white phosphorous.
Increasing the average IQ of both countries
They’ve also talked about massively leveraging cloud computing and streaming, it’s likely a lot of actual scenery isn’t part of the offline file size unless you cache the areas for offline play (if that’s even an option)
Two people refusing to vote for anyone or voting for a third party has the exact same impact as one person voting for Trump instead of Kamala.
Depends on what definition you use, classically a social Democrat is someone who believes in using democratic means to gradually and peacefully transition from capitalism to socialism. The definition you are using is actually closer to a social liberal but even that isn’t quite right, welfare does not imply a mixed market economy on its own, welfare can exist in a pure laissez fair market economy. Social liberalism is in favor a mixed market economy which is a further step left from simply a regulated market economy with welfare. In a mixed market economy key industries are publicized and owned and operated by the government for the public benefit while allowing for the possibility of private competition as well as an open market economy in other industries and areas.