That’s a really old accusation made since the 60s I think.
That’s a really old accusation made since the 60s I think.
Maybe he will switch even quicker if you punch him or pull his teeth out.
I get that this is expensive. However, it should also work with RAM if you accept slower speeds I guess. The question is of course if it’s still usable then.
Doesn’t that mean RAM?
Well, there have been several music lawsuits about certain songs and their amount of identity to others. If you were to write something as closely to another author that you are imitating something like trademark mannerisms there may be a case for that.
I think that writing in someone else’s style to an extent that it becomes very obvious is indeed something that raises copyright concerns.
Antisemitism isn’t and was never exclusive to Nazis
deleted by creator
What an incredibly annoying piece of software. I avoid it wherever I can but it’s unfortunately standard where I work.
Something for sure
True but it might be one of the few reasons websites are even optimised for something else than chrome these days.
Kind of a big jump
The LLM is a tool. It’s like granting copyright to a paintbrush.
That’s not what I meant by that. People should have the rights to the products they produce using the tools at their disposal.
I see a lot of Dunning Kruger here as well. The fact is that you can generate novel images/texts/whatever with these tools. They may mostly suck but they’re still novel so they can be copyrighted by whoever used these tools to create them.
30 fps would be ok for a game like this although it seems that you need to have a pretty beefy setup even for that.
Where did I ever say that a stupid AI should get any rights to its own product?
If it was a compression algorithm then it would be insanely efficient and that’d be the big thing about it. The simple fact is that they aren’t able to reproduce their exact training data so no, they aren’t storing it in a highly compressed form.
Because nobody wants to sell this?