This is from June. There’s a lot more to this story now. Its sad that we’re already going down the road of posting old articles that contain incomplete information.
This is from June. There’s a lot more to this story now. Its sad that we’re already going down the road of posting old articles that contain incomplete information.
We don’t even know if this claim is true.
You’re not gonna be downloading the entirety of threads when you interact with them. I don’t see how interacting with threads would fill up your storage any faster than interacting with another instance.
This is pretty true. I was talking to my gf abt meta making Instagram threads and she was confused why meta was making a product under the Instagram label before I told her that meta owned Instagram. Tbf to her she hasn’t installed Instagram in years so its not like she would see meta branding in their current app or whatever they do.
Wait why shouldn’t we try to right past wrongs when those past wrongs continue to wrong people?
I get what you’re saying but people shouldnt have to pay for such an important thing. Obviously news publications need money somehow but paying for news should never be required.
I guess generally online the term magazine hasn’t been used often. Then again subreddit wasn’t either and that’s a made up word.
The article says the game had to be modified to stay on the app store. Maybe the play store version was also modified?