deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
No, they really are. No doubt they do plenty of stuff at the behest of the NSA, but they are also a deeply disfunctional company with conflicts between departments and bare minimum funding for security, since it’s seen as a cost centre
Ehhh that’s likely enough, but Microsoft is also just shit at fixing things
Nah, nonprofit state-run landlords (in countries which have them) are great, and strong protections for renters are good. I don’t want to buy a house, I move around a lot, don’t wanna deal with lawyers every time I move, don’t wanna be responsible for maintenance, I just want some basic level of security and not to be completely ripped off.
Why is 85% the magic number? Just because you say so? I do agree that increased property taxes are important, but there’s no reason not to also make rental contracts less exploitative.
Oh, I see, you aren’t actually interested in nuance, just trolling
It’s you who has the logic the wrong way around. The rich profiting from the healthcare system is why the healthcare system is bad, that doesn’t exclude them from profiting from other things too. In your analogy OP’s statement equates to “this Toyota is a car” (or “this car is a Toyota” depending on which thing is the rich and which thing is ruining a societal good).
Because it’s cheaper than paying for your own private healthcare
That doesn’t sound ridiculously nuanced to me, that sounds straightforwardly like what OP said.
That is absolutely not certain. Sure, it probably won’t be trump, he’ll be too old to be capable by then. But the republicans could easily find someone meeting most of those criteria, and they still have 4 years to try an insurrection
Building massive production capacity to replace all the cars just locks us in to having cars though
That happened the other way around
People who previously were at the high end of GPU can now afford used H100s -> they sell their GPUs -> we can maybe afford them
A degree in law and passing the bar does in fact show someone knows about the law, a prerequisite for following it in the context of being a lawmaker.
Sure they have; nonetheless the chances are dramatically lower than elsewhere. When they do that, it’s news.
The review standards for nature geoscience are pretty high, I think they will have thought of that
Because they prefer electing republicans to winning if the cost of winning would be compromising even a fraction of an inch with the left
Idk (I’m not op) but I think when people say “can I install Linux on this” everyone knows they mean gnu/Linux. Yes, if I’m picking a container base image obviously alpine is also Linux, and if we’re talking about kernels then Android is too. But if we’re talking about desktop OSes then I think it’s close enough.
🎵 Every broke motherfucker finna form a gang
And when we come we taking everything 🎵