among doesn’t mean they did only that
among doesn’t mean they did only that
/s missing
it’s Microsoft so probably not unless corporate account. You know the other solution.
It’s a fluid dynamics equation, cannot be analytically solved unless laminar flow assumption is valid.
Naviers stokes equation looks incompressibility fluid. Only possible to solve it for strictly laminar flow.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier%E2%80%93Stokes_equations#Incompressible_flow
Again it’s because businesses make revenue, i.e. Fiat money and people trade that money and exchange it for things etc…
That’s faith in a business not money
Comparison never made much sense, everyone uses money. The same cannot be said for Bitcoin
Not a canine expert by any means but it indeed appears to be a dog. Mystery solved!
it’s a quantum thing , as in you never its location without checking for brain activity first?
It is vague and it needs to be because at best this is second hand account of what it was said.
last section of the document
Not cost effective by any means, but then again none buys apple for cost effective anything. Some people just the brand it seems 🤦
Lock screen in a ebook reader is not something you are bound to see much often since I would hope you have some kind of protection over it.
for once the comparison is apt
Ouais (pronounced as oue means yeah)
Yup, don’t tell them though.
Nothing for this case at least.
It’s completely unrelated to Boeing per se. Likely a maintenance issue, maybe repair done wrong.
Why waste Billions? The french invented something more effective!