I cannot tell if you are being serious or just having fun with buzzwords
I cannot tell if you are being serious or just having fun with buzzwords
No, I think everyone should absolutely vote and fuck trump. I’m just pointing out that this meme is misinformation and wrong.
Presidents aren’t decided by the popular vote though?
Seriously, fuck off with the AI shit. At best it’s intelligent regex. And “intelligence” here means a specific thing.
Well this is just a silly take. Have you not watched the state of the unions during bidens presidency? He was a decent politician. That includes speeches.
What? Dude I’m voting for the D candidate no matter what. I’m just saying mrs Harris isn’t a strong candidate and has never been.
Fuck man lol
Lol or not, so we forget 2016? Her whole campaign run?
For those who wish to re learn: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris_2020_presidential_campaign
Nah, she’s never been a contender. Unless the DNC rallies behind her and the rest of us agree, she will be a small blip on the radar as she was before being put into the VP spot
So we’re just ignoring this part then?
In Britain, being nominated as a local election candidate simply involves signing some forms, with no deposit required. A paper candidate will often do no campaigning at all and so be able to submit a zero return of election expenses, simplifying the paperwork for the election agent. Paper candidates are commonly fielded in different locations by all the major parties in both local and national elections.
There’s actually a term for it
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dummy_candidate
Or this - see the UK section
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_candidate
“All the work to be a candidate”…
Sweet summer child…
Assume I can’t draw the conclusions you want me to. Please explain it
Arguably any revolution comes from a critical mass of the population being unhappy…
Howso
Which would be better to you? You’re a civilian somewhere - do you prefer to watch your livelyhood slowly being destroyed by your government or do you want a boom?
I’d assume the former gives you a chance to recognize it and do something, the latter is just boom.
1: I wholeheartedly believe being a whistleblower is a courageous and brave act. Full stop.
2: drawing conclusions as to why these people decided to speak up when they did without hearing it from them is nonsense.
3: assuming and repeating a John Gresham novel from news articles between corporations and their whistleblowers is not only buying into a conspiracy theory, but is also parroting it.
4: partaking in these conspiratorial shenanigans helps no one and isn’t something to be waved away as harmless - otherwise, what’s the difference here and qanon?
If the “bravery” and admiration comes against the idea of assassination, then it completely matters. Idk why you’re hand waving the nonsense here
Isn’t that part of the point? If the populace suffers, government changes are more likely
The ol’ double tap never fails