Few months ago on another platform, I watched a video that same shitty kind of people who must be absolutely extinct at same situation just destroyed a vintage intricate musical instrument (very much heirloom—accordion/keyboard?) as if they were proudly doing right; as if it was how they, humans, are supposed to live (life without music TF to them).

Just as I said long ago (I deleted it as I left the platform),

I dare, and I will never ever be born and live in an unmelodious and inharmonious world that they’re desperately creating (through their absurd malevolent passionate principles), an invibrant and soulless world that nobody who’s gratefully listened and forever enjoyed music and other wonderful things will never ever wish.

Another shitty propaganda cause they know instinctively how great does music affect everyone’s minds to realize wider and better and never worse I believe. Annihilating music is as same as burning the books and suppressing any media.

Establishing a count system for user profile will provide more competitive fake and shitty racing posts and comments. Better without it here, thus more real and humane discussions.

He rip out not only the great marketing artifact but also the users’ sentiment from seeing the bird logo reminding them of how long they’ve used the site which is now shockingly changing.

Once the celebrities or official pages or figure people leave that site for its dismaying complications, that will be the doom of it as followers of those don’t have other significant reasons to stay.

deleted by creator

It becomes an already apparent reminder: Beware of what you see on the Internet (as if beware of who you meet and what you hear from them)—Never just trust ahead (but don’t be afraid already to ever encounter because there are efficient and convenient ways to outwit and bust those malbots as I believe we humans can think, debunk and dissect info to truth.)

But sadly to some degree, real online people have scarily begun intentionally/mischievously asking other real online people whether if the others’ texts are AI-generated or not, without even comprehending first what every of those texts is aiming (maybe, they are not actually well edified to media literacy or reading contexts deeply.)

I’ve experienced that someone rushed questioned my comment if it were AI-generated or not (instead of why I said or even what was my straight-out point) that made me confused into pissed to badly confront once (and never again) as I have no idea how I could better respond and then prove (Even I told the truth that I made my comment all myself straight from my core & concern despite my vibrant embarrassing writing, I bet nothing would ever change as people would always still doubt upon the permanent question, and I should better end up in silence next time ever if no better options yet.)

And also a polka-dotted somewhat colorblind quiz to determine a number/letter formed on polka dots or sometimes scatters of randomly colored and assorted shapes.

I encountered a quiz (I forgot what’s called) on a website (I forgot also its name) to determine which of following audios does change a speaker’s voice in the middle of his narration/speech. So it requires keen hearing and delicate recognition of voice/speech characteristics (timbre, texture, intonation, accent, articulation, pacing, mood etc…). I’m have no idea if malbots could determine whosever voices will be.