• TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Correct. So in the car example, it really only works if the US puts a tariff on imports, and then they do some kind of government credit for domestic cars. This would raise the price of imported cars while making domestic cars more affordable to Americans.

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      You’re placing a lot of faith in our totally trustworthy, honest, caring, and cooperative domestic auto manufacturers to…you know…not just look at the new increased price of imports, as well as the government credit for buying domestic…and raise all their prices to that amount across the board, with the increase adding more expense to the consumer directly that is pure profit on their end.

      • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Correct. It was just an example under ideal conditions when everyone involved was acting in good faith, not taking into account capitalism, which demands the graph go up no matter what.

        Anyway, either way it demonstrates that tariffs aren’t free money (or even a money making tool) like Trump believes them to be, and the BS he is trying to sell Americans on.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Only kinda, that assumes enough people still buy the imports otherwise there’s no money to transfer over.

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Even domestic cars are assembly in America but the parts come from other countries so no you still going be effected by that.

        Also keep in mind there a reason shit not made here. We can’t compete with their cheap labor prices. So even if you tried to move some of those jobs back here it would still cost the consumer a shit ton more money on said goods.

        • RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Trump doesn’t understand it though. He plans* to use it to finance childcare.

          *As if he would do something like that. Why keep kids fed when you can line your pockets instead.

          • zephorah@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            There’s a sound bite of him at a recent rally talking about how much he hated paying overtime and how he would avoid it.

            He doesn’t care.

            • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Trump has a history of treating workers poorly for decades. He has been known to exploit labor from those that might not want to talk with Immigration, paying pennies on the dollar, or just straight out refusing to pay them and threatening counter-lawsuits if they try to use the courts to recover any money. When he did his feed with Elon he gave Elon praise for firing workers on strike.

              Trump and Musk discussed firing striking workers. The UAW is now seeking an NLRB investigation

              “You’re the greatest cutter,” Trump told Musk. “I look at what you do. You walk in and say, ‘You want to quit?’ I won’t mention the name of the company but they go on strike and you say, ’That’s OK. You’re all gone.'”

              Musk said, “Yeah,” and laughed while Trump was talking.

              In June, eight former workers at SpaceX, Musk’s rocket company, sued the company and Musk, alleging he ordered them fired after they challenged what they called rampant sexual harassment and a hostile “Animal House”-style work environment at the company.