• kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    almost textbook sociopathy

    I guarantee you have no fucking clue what the word even means in a medical context; because I’ve not given you enough information in the slightest to be even close to making that kind of diagnosis.

    The word you’re looking for is misanthrope.

    • Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sociopaths can develop attachments to those close to them, usually based more on personal benefit/gain but they sometimes confuse this with genuine emotional attachment.

      Though yes, I’m not making an actual medical diagnosis.

      • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I have no horse in this race, I just wanted to stop by and say sociopathy is not a diagnosis. You’re looking for Antisocial Personality Disorder. Laypeople poorly use those terms trying to differentiate someone’s disregard for right and wrong from someone else’s.

        Now that I’ve come in here and unloaded my nerd-ass “Umm actually” bullshit, I’ll let you get back to talking shit about willful idiots.

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Sociopathy was absolutely a diagnosis until the DSM decided to fuck up a whole host of mental issues by combining them all into one vague term.

        • Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Neat, good to know the real term.

          Admittedly, as I an a lay person, using a commonly understood term in a social context does seem more productive/efficient than using the proper medical term, then explaining it.

          It’s sort of like how we say people will vote for Harris or trump when in actuality they are voting for electors, but everyone (well, except for a worrying number of Republican crazies and a disgraced former president) understands them to be the same thing.

            • Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Some taken at first, none now. Especially as I imagine you see that incorrect application thrown across the internet with reckless abandon!

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        This guy thinks we need to be an EXPERT to be able to judge clearly visible patterns, WOO boy. Wait 'till I tell you about the color of the sky! I’ll be a meteorologist or some shit next!