• taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      If it came with no downsides, sure. Not being able to play Playstation is a very minor part in life not really deserving any kind of “fundamental rights” based argument, unlike locking people up.

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          But you didn’t purchase them, you licensed them conditionally.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              In other words, no you do not currently have a fundamental right to that content.

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                11 months ago

                In other words, no not even close to what I said.

                Often these little legalese situations are illegal or legally undefined, and the only reason it holds is because no one has pushed against it

                  • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Any terms of service agreement. When legally challenged, they usually do not hold up in court.

                    Playstation makes you sign one that says you dont get to own the games you pay for and they can take them away whenever. A judge would likely tell them thats illegal, and they have to render services paid.