• kukkurovaca@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is surfacing a fundamental division between mindsets in federation: the people who say don’t worry about which instance you’re on are bought into the promise that federation can “just work” like email. But the reality is that if you care about moderation at all (like, even to the extent of being for or against having any of it) then sooner or later you’re going to have to make harder decisions about instances.

    It’s pretty normal for long-term fediverse users to change instances several times over the course of however long this stuff has been around. It’s unclear to me whether any existing Lemmy instances would be a good fit for me in the long term TBH and I would expect that to be true for some time, as so many instances are still figuring things out internally.

    Defederation decisions like beehaw made are extremely normal and rational. With their level of moderation staffing and for their user base, they determined it was unsustainable to remain federated with instances that were generating more moderation workload. If it wasn’t them today it would be another instance tomorrow; this will keep happening.

    Also, I see a lot of folks saying this is lazy for beehaw, but it’s important to understand that from their perspective, this problem wouldn’t arise if moderators here were keeping a cleaner house and preventing bad actors from using the platform. (Not saying either take is entirely correct.)

    In a sense, moderation best practices on the fediverse are inimically hostile to scaling the fediverse up to new users. (And if you ask folks with smaller but prosperous instances that have healthy internal vibes, they’ll probably tell you this is good.)

    This is much more fraught on Lemmy than it is on Mastodon, because you’re building communities hosted on a particular instance and there’s not currently a way to move the community. So, if I were to start a community here and then finally decide a year from now that this place is too big a defederation target to stay on, what do I do?

    Similarly, to avoid endless duplication of communities, folks have been encouraged to participate with existing communities instead of starting a new one on their own instance everytime. But anyone here who has gotten involved with communities on Beehaw will now no longer be able to do so unless they move to a different instance. (Which may be hard, as open instances that are easy to join are the ones that are harder for small instances to handle, which is what caused this in the first place.)

    Some of those folks are going to create their own alternative communities on their servers, which to any third-party servers not in the loop on the defederation drama will be potentially confusing. This has the potential to create a cultural tend toward polarization of community norms between everything goes and what we see on Mastodon as content warning policing, but of which are, to me, undesirable.

    The best case scenario is that the majority of large communities end up being hosted on instances that have sufficiently rigorous moderation standards and sufficiently robust moderation staff to not impose an unsustainable workload on smaller instances. Then as long as everyone who’s not a nazi federates with those instances, things should go smoothly…ish. But that’s hard both because “sufficiently rigorous” is different for everyone and because moderation labor doesn’t grow on trees.

    • livejamie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The part where things get tricky is that beehaw currently has ~15 of the top 50 communities across the entire fediverse and has become the defacto discussion grounds for gaming/tech/news/etc.

      One could argue this goes against the whole concept of decentralized communication in the first place, and this may be a position beehaw doesn’t want to be in.

      Beehaw has every right to foster a tight-knit community that adheres to its desires.

      But there also is a level of responsibility and custodianship over these large communities they foster for the betterment and adoption of the fediverse.

      • lmaydev@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess the others will need to work with them to fix the issues that resulted in this decision.

        It’s all about teamwork across the verse and we’ll have to see if they can manage it.

    • jcg@halubilo.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very cogent writeup, seeing how the lemmy.world people were reacting really validated Beehaw’s decision in my eyes. People are getting really angry, and I wonder if those were the same people who bought into the whole “lemmys great because no one has 100% control” idea, only to be upset when the person in control of a slice they like decides they want to do something disagreeable with it. In the first place, one community shouldn’t have carried the burden of the entire content and community of the “Gaming” or “Technology” sphere, it just kind of turned out that way because once they gained momentum, everybody else just flocked to it. And you can’t blame them, that’s where the content is, and the content is why they’re here.

      On the whole, though the software doesn’t really restrict you to one or the other, instances are very quickly separating into two camps - viewer and host. Viewer instances are instances like mine, where the majority of users are consumers and not creators. Yeah, I like to run my mouth around these parts but most of the content on my instance doesn’t originate from it. The host instances host communities, and so they carry the burden of having to moderate those communities and the servers/sysadmins carry the burden of having to relay all that communication to all the other instances. I think it’s this part that needs work as we grow, because the best analogy for a Lemmy community is an email group. Can you imagine an email group with tens of thousands of subscribers all just emailing each other over and over again? Lemmy is pretty much just that, but displayed differently.

      • deva@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        seeing how the lemmy.world people were reacting really validated Beehaw’s decision in my eyes

        I think people have a right to be upset when they feel unfairly banned from communities for no fault of their own.

    • xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      btw, e-mail servers regularly defederate/block domains that allow a lot of spam…

    • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a very good write up. I think there is a big difference in responsiblilty between community hosting instances and viewing instances, and I believe that we will see issues like this more often as community size is ballooning due to the reddit issues. I do believe, or maybe it’s more of a hope, that over time larger communities will bounce around instances until they land on an instance that can better handle the responsibility of moderation, and eventually we’ll end up with a few large instances that host popular communities, and smaller instance that host more niche communities.

      I feel that this is the growing pains stage of Lemmy, and if a few QoL features like community migration get worked in, this platform will stabilize into something great.

  • oh_so_hazey@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can completely understand why they did but it really sucks that it had to happen. Hopefully, as the Fediverse grows, better tools are made available so instances don’t need to defederate from each other.

    With that said, I think it’s a pretty amazing concept that they can. Terrible, sure, but nonetheless amazing.

    I also wasn’t aware that other instances vetted their users? This was the first one I picked. Is there a plan to address the issues beehaw brought up?

    • iorale@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      With that said, I think it’s a pretty amazing concept that they can. Terrible, sure, but nonetheless amazing.

      I’ve been calling it a double-edged sword from the moment I knew that could happen in Mastodon and after I joined Lemmy, we see as normal to block lemmygrad from the beginning and that’s understandable, but if an owner goes block-happy they could leave a lot of people stranded and inside their echo-chamber.
      They’d be losing everything then and would be forced to migrate to other instance or create their own which may be too much as time goes by and people post more and more.

      I said this from the beginning but until we get migration tools to carry our content with us to other instance, think of your account as disposable.

      • areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I think a migration tool would be very helpful. I basically just signed up for the first instance that looked good without doing much research.

        • iorale@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Having to do so much research just to join an instance is one of the biggest problems of the fediverse.

          • Lith@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I saw some advice saying “don’t overthink it, just choose one” and I’m glad I didn’t take it because it seems like it couldn’t be any further from the truth. Until migrating your account is an option, this just seems like a bunch of Reddits talking to each other, you can still lose everything if your local admin goes on a power trip.

  • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They made the users suffer for their unwillingness to cope with their situation.

    Instead of planning ahead and only accepting a limited amount of users, which would have severed only a fraction of users from us, they decided to grow to become one of the biggest instances, and now took some interesting communities with them, along with cutting off their own users from communities here.

    I hope their user base migrates to other, more open instances, and the communities lost will spring into existence elsewhere.

    • mercurly@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow… I’m new here so I’m still learning how all this works but I tried to apply to beehaw at first and they were having severe issues with their approval system so I either got denied or, most likely, got stuck in application purgatory.

      Honestly, with how Lemmy is set up, it seems like it makes more sense to cater your instance to a more niche crowd than “all nice people” like beehaw was attempting to do.

      • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m new here too, could someone explain the difference between Lemmy and Beehaw (and kbin which it looks like this is posted on?) and what it means that they’re defederated?

        • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          beehaw.org is a Lemmy instance (server). kbin is a platform similar to Lemmy and it can federate with Lemmy instances, as well as integrate with them nicely (not the case with Mastodon and Lemmy/kbin). Defederation means cutting off ties with a certain instance. Beehaw defederated from sh.itjust.works and lemmy.world, which means that their users won’t be able to see posts from these instances. On the other hand, members of sh.itjust.works and lemmy.world will be able to see beehaw’s communities and posts, but can’t post in them. A bit of a clusterfuck, I know.

          • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I appreciate the explanation. Are there any good articles that run down the way this whole thing is organized?

      • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s most regrettable is the timing. Just when Lemmy had a big growth spurt, they cut off a big part of the community. We’ll likely see this happen again in 2 weeks, when Reddit shuts down all 3rd party mobile apps, and again when they close old.reddit. I hope that some of the issues Lemmy currently faces will be fixed by then.

        • TiffyBelle@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d argue it’s perfect timing. Better that users across the broader fediverse know now that supporting Beehaw communities and helping them to grow with content won’t be in the best interests of the fediverse more broadly, and to put their time and effort into communities hosted elsewhere before they’d grown even larger.

  • MeowdyPardner@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s easy to take this personally but I think it’s more about the moderation tools in Lemmy not being adequate at the moment so this is the best bandaid solution for now. We need to quickly put effort into developing better moderation tools like limiting other servers without fully defederating, limiting specific communities, forcing nsfw on communities/instances, proxying reports to origin servers so admins have better feedback on their instance user’s bad behavior, and many other things if we want to prevent defederating like this from being the only option.

    I think infighting about this decision and differing moderation styles instead of focusing together on moderation challenges and tooling deficiencies risks tearing the community / federation apart and is counterproductive to the goal of being better than reddit.

    • discodoubloon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed. They do deserve their own points if they want to be that type of community. I’d say for instance if places like AskHistorians arise within lemmy or kbin, federating with just those would be interesting.

      There are always going to be more exclusive communities. Humans just work like that. I say we ride with it for now.

      Federation should be a gradient. If they want to close themselves off why is it using ActivityPub to begin with?

      • cloaker@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        its _ federation._ Some communities only want certain people. Once mod tools are better we will see changes. Let it grow.

  • Lund3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I specifically just deleted my beehaw account and created one here because of this… This move makes me reconsider this whole lemmy thing.

    • SlowNoPoPo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah, was starting to like it here, but honestly if any instance will just defederate the second something inconvenient happens… we won’t have a site with good content that will keep people around

    • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, me as well. Seems kbin has a way more open minded view on things. They don’t defederate from anyone, which suits me just fine. I wouldn’t like to defederated from anyone, including lemmygrad. There are some interesting reads over there (at least for me).

    • Zoness@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find it really frustrating to build up a feed of content, only to lose it when moderator fights begin. What servers are next? Which one do I join to get the most content?

      I want this to succeed but I don’t know how I can recommend it to people today, since they’re going to ask the same questions.

      • Lund3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly! And the idea that I fully cannot see other servers, or never interact with them anymore feels like wasted time.

    • goat@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      But isn’t that good? It means you have much more freedom now, you can make communities, post more stuff, don’t have to follow a non existant set of rules.

      • llama@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s true but there are nuanced social consequences for the entire group because of the actions one or a few individuals. The moderation model of Lemmy will be different and needs to start at the home instance. Because all it takes is a few people to act up and suddenly your instance has no content.

      • Lund3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To an extend. It’s more concerning that I can build up my user, interacting with other communities, building my network and suddenly I loose all that because my server suddenly decides it no longer want to interact with other servers.

        • goat@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          hate to say that’s on you, dude. You should look at how that instance works with others.

          Apparently migration is in the works, so you should be able to keep your beehaw account.

    • Alice@exploding-heads.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      DUDE SAME The whole point was that we want a place that # ISNT CENSORED. Or getting banned because something I said offends you.

      Like I’ve gotta learn all this shit and read a 600 page instruction manual about how to use lemmy, but I can’t call someone a faggot (Talking about when someone says some lame ass shit, not calling gay people faggots)

      • bood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you want to call people faggots for no reason like it’s 2003 just >>>/b/ dude, it didn’t go anywhere. They’ll probably reply to you with a bunch of (images of) dicks though. If it quacks like a duck…

      • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Congratulations, you are the first Lemmy user I have recognized from earlier as an asshole. What’s with the shouting and the pointlessly provocative language? Do you feel an irresistible drive to get attention?

        Now I have to decide if I want to actually use the Block User feature.

        • Redfruitz@burggit.moe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          blocking and banning people for spamming unironically neo nazi and transphobic shit is understandable . but the problem with most mod,is that they ban people who dare to barely criticize them or their opinions . they take everything personally . i got perma ban from reddit because I told a mod he don’t understand irony and satire . there is also a double standard .if something has a lot of upvote they let it go, but the same copy paste comment with less upvote can result in ban. resulting in banning people who already agrees with them on 90% of their opinion .

          • sping@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well this would be just a personal block on my part since I’m no mod. I’ve seen enough from this user that it’s clear my world would be a better place without their comments in it, but I haven’t clicked the button yet…

      • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Have you tried 4chan? Because I’m pretty sure you make a great chan stan and would love all the childish channing.

        Also, maybe try updating your vocabulary? Learn more words so you don’t have to always sound like an angry, edgy, child.

      • demonicbullet@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        First person I’ve seen actually go negative on Lemmy, good reason too.

        You might be part of the reason behind their defederation with your vocabulary.

      • Pobe@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What? No, that was Voat. You know, the place all the insane racists went before it collapsed.

  • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not a good look. I get its the admins choice and all but it just wiped out a lot of my subscriptions. Its not a good look from the perspective of new users and increases the number of duplicate communities across instances.

    I had hopes for it but I guess I’m one of the lucky ones who signed up for lemmy.world.

    I think they should just ban problematic users not the whole instance.

    • Claidheamh@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think they should just ban problematic users not the whole instance.

      When the vast majority of the problematic users come from 2 instances with open registration, trying to do that is like stopping a flood with a bucket. I think theirs is a perfectly reasonable response to the troll attack they were just subjected to.

    • Googleproof@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I can get their desire to vet users before they can join their instance, but for me (and I suspect a lot of other people who are just starting with Lemmy, or just shy people) the effort of making a social interaction with a stranger was enough of a turn off that I went elsewhere. Beehaw still seems nice, I may still make an account there at some point. But, to figure out if a place suits me, first I lurk, then I engage by voting, then I engage by commenting, and eventually I may eventually post. I get applications, but they feel intrusive to how I use the internet.

      I also get why they defederated, frankly there’s a tonne of low effort from the big new instances. However, everyone should expect low effort right now because users are antsy from having left reddit, and the low effort posts are the anxious laughter of people new to the party who don’t know anyone yet. So the defederation isn’t a good look, and will cause bad feeling with and within beehaw, so their mods have my sympathy. Better to have enabled downvoting and let the community handle the low effort posts.

      • ptsdstillinmymind @lemmy.studio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly, they got rid of actual voting in order to power moderate. This is all on them, users could also block whatever communities they didn’t like.

    • areyouevenreal@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They could also just use a whitelist of users who are allowed to comment/post on there. I have suggested as much but we will see how they respond. I might try and contact a mod over there if that’s possible.

      Edit: I’ve been told by another user that this isn’t currently supported. I think it would be a good feature to add to lemmy.

  • MysticSmear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    as someone who just joined, and is still trying to understand “federated” can someone give me an ELI5 rundown of what this means? I thought it didn’t matter which instance you joined because they were all connected, does this mean that other instances can just… block an entire instance?

    • iSharted@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s essentially like email. If you have a gmail, you can communicate with anyone on any other email service. If gmail determines that spamsite.xyz, you won’t send or recieve any emails from that domain. Same thing here. You’re using lemmy.world. If lemmy.world defederates with my server sh.itjust.works, you won’t see my messages. We will just never cross paths.

      • MysticSmear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        hmm…that seems super counterintuitive to what I thought the fediverse was all about. That would be like Gmail just deciding all Yahoo emails are spam. doesn’t this mean that Lemmy will just be a bunch of islands of content that will require users to have multiple accounts for each instance?

        • Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apparently the main issue is that the “ALL” feed starts showing posts of other instances when one user subscribes to anything there. So if e.g. you don’t block a NSFW instance, you will have popular porn posts showing up on your instance as well.

        • iSharted@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          If everyone plays nice, you get to have really big islands. But that’s only if your overlords (the mods) allow it. If they don’t like an instance, see ya! I don’t think this happens often other than blocking spam and illegal activity, but you can clearly see how this will make all the mini islands.

          • MysticSmear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think people tend to be tribal by nature. It would likely be folly to think everyone will not use petty squabbles and minor disagreements to cut off other people they disagree with for the first time in history. This could really hurt lemmy in the long run if everyone only lives on their island.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What if someone from lemmy.world makes a comment, and someone from lemmy.ca replies to the comment?

        Would someone from sh.itjust.works see the reply to the original comment but not the original comment? Or is the whole thread after that point non-existent after that point?

  • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think this is pretty unreasonable. They should not have allowed themselves to become one of the biggest instances with the existing moderation team. That was never going to work. Placing the blame on the open registration instances and mod tools seems silly. That said I hope this does lead to an improvement in mod tooling.

    • Hate@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They should not have allowed themselves to become one of the biggest instances with only FOUR moderators. That was never going to work.

      might be a dumb question, but how could’ve they prevented this?

      • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think they should have made a deliberate attempt to remain outside of the top three biggest instances like lemmy.ml. Considering the conscious decision to only have the admins be the only mods (that is there are four mods site-wide that moderate ALL communities) these issues were easily foreseen and they should have accepted that they could not realistically compete for the largest instance while maintaining their moderation goals.

      • arkcom@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’ve existed as a small community for a year and a half. In all that time, surely they have met/interacted with some people they trust enough to delegate mod duties to.

  • LostCause@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It‘s the bubble concept I already curated for myself on Reddit by filtering out what feels like half the website. Except now I can sort of choose my pre-made bubble, which is more effort to be certain (have to research the admins of a chosen instance a bit and understand their rules and values), but I don‘t mind that.

  • sverit@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t bothered beehaw users just simply block the instances they don’t like by themselfes? Does this have to be instance-wide?

    • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The issue they stated wasn’t with other federated communities, but with the users from those federated instances spamming their communities. Beehaw has a strict account policy and only want users they’ve personally vetted commenting and posting in their communities. So in effect they are blocking instances they’ve determined to be problematic by defederating them. At least that’s my understanding of it.

      • sverit@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue they stated wasn’t with other federated communities, but with the users from those federated instances spamming their communities.

        Yes, I understand that, but this seems to be effectively the same. Why not leave the decision to the individual users?

        Beehaw has a strict account policy and only want users they’ve personally vetted commenting and posting in their communities.

        Well, the fediverse kind of seems to be the wrong choice for them, then. It lives from the federation. If you want to be isolated it’s just a plain old forum.

        • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I also thought it was weird to make a federated Instance and also try to have a human review application process. Sounds kinda silly to me.

            • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              When you go to create an account on beehaw, they have a questionnaire you have to fill out with questions like “what do you plan to contribute to beehaw?” and then one of the 4 admins that run beehaw have to read your answers and then approve or reject.

              I don’t blame them for being a small team running a forum and want to keep trolls and spam out, but it sounds like they are trying to have the best of 2 contradictory worlds. with the selective tight group of like minded individuals, but also have their communities reach a large audience and grow interaction. It just unfortunately doesn’t work that way.

              But now these 4 admins stumbled into hosting the some of largest popular communities in the fediverse and are struggling to handle the bullcrap that comes with being popular on the internet.

              • FantasticFox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                But what stops a troll just writing whatever they think the Admins want to read in the form?

                It just seems like security theatre, it provides the illusion that they are filtering their userbase, but in reality there’s no way for them to validate whatever anyone writes, so it’s pretty worthless.

                • Taxxor@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I’d even say it’s more likely for someone that specifically wants to troll beehaw to fill out those questions and potential genuine users are more likely to just use another instance with an easier sign up process

                • Chefdano3@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mean, nothing stops them that I know of. I also think it’s a little pointless

        • DJSchaffner@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Seems like you are missing the point a bit.
          Because of the open registration policy of those instances and the many users they do not have the necessary tools and manpower to moderate harassing and offensive posts which go against their policy (which they can absolutely set as they want, since it’s their instance) so they block the users of those instances from posting and commenting for the time being.
          So it’s not about isolation themselves just for the sake of being and exclusive club of people but because the moderators can’t handle the amount of traffic

          • sverit@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Blocking all users from those instances still feels like overkill for me. Just let the beehaw users block the offensive users from other instaces if they feel they need to? That would be far more selective.

            • DerinA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Doesn’t that just put the onus on blocking communities onto the individual user? If that’s the case, then why bother joining a community like Beehaw - which is marked as a Safe Space for folk?

              Personally, I feel it’s within their rights to block communities with open signup rules, at least until better moderation tools are present.

    • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They wana make a forum like community. Just look at the icons of all of their communities, they’re tailor made and themed.

  • tallwookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    eh I just read through the post over there, I suppose their concerns are somewhat valid, to a point, but there really isnt a “safe space” anywhere except between your ears.

    really just reads like excuses to being lazy.

    • DigiWolf@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My problem with Beehaw in general is it reeks of overzealous and manipulative mods. The internet is full of awful people but to pretend you can make an island of purity where you get to decide what is pure is going to be a worse idea in the long run.

      • Frz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I find it ironic that they say fake niceness will only scare people off, but all the “ethos engineering” only promotes a culture of fake niceness. I don’t buy all this “walled utopia” idealism, especially since this place isn’t like Discord with private servers, but a public interconnected forum. Why choose to set up on the Fediverse if you’re not open to ”strangers” accessing your community? But oh well, I think they’ll probably defederate more and more over time (or switch to whitelist).

          • taladar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Reminds me a bit of parents who want the benefit of just putting their kid on the internet so they don’t have to entertain the kid themselves but then try to censor everyone when the kid finds anything online they didn’t want the kid to see.

  • lvl@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, look at the bright side: the evolution of descentralized federation now depends on the moderation topic. I wouldn’t be surprised if someone takes federation to the next level and creates a moderation tool which would work out of the box for the fediverse, at the technology level (e.g. ActivityPub).

    If and when this happens, federation has a bigger chance in replacing current centralized social networks.

    • EnglishMobster@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been kicking around an idea in my head of making a Lemmy fork that has Tildes’ ideas about modding baked in. (I would fork Kbin but I don’t know PHP.)

      In my experience, it’s always been the best approach to select new moderators from the people known as active, high-quality members of the community. My goal with the trust system on Tildes is to turn this process of discovering the best members and granting them more influence into a natural, automatic one.

      Trusting someone is a gradual process that comes from seeing how they behave over time. This can be reflected in the site’s mechanics—for example, if a user consistently reports posts correctly for breaking the rules, eventually it should be safe to just trust that user’s reports without preemptive review. Other users that aren’t as consistent can be given less weight—perhaps it takes three reports from lower-trust users to trigger an action, but only one report from a very high-trust user.

      This approach can be applied to other, individual mechanics as well. For example, a user could gain (or lose) access to particular abilities depending on whether they use them responsibly. If done carefully, this could even apply to voting—just as you’d value the recommendation of a trusted friend more than one from a random stranger, we should be able to give more weight to the votes of users that consistently vote for high-quality posts.

      Another important factor will be having trust decay if the user stops participating in a community for a long period of time. Communities are always evolving, and if a user has been absent for months or years, it’s very likely that they no longer have a solid understanding of the community’s current norms. Perhaps users that previously had a high level of trust should be able to build it back up more quickly, but they shouldn’t indefinitely retain it when they stop being involved.

      Between these two factors, we should be able to ensure that communities end up being managed by members that actively contribute to them, not just people that want to be a moderator for its own sake.

      Combine that with things like AutoModerator (the person behind Tildes is the one who built AutoMod on Reddit) and it seems like a reasonable way for a platform to promote good stuff and cut down on bad.

      You’ll have to deal with per-community “power users” with a lot of power, but the alternative is unelected mods who can be just as bad.

      I don’t know if I’m ever going to get around to making that fork. But I think taking Tildes’ approach to mods is novel and fresh, and I quite like it.

      • joan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s also how it works on StackOverflow and HN. The more karma you have the more access to moderation tools.